Sunday, December 7, 2025

The Second Coming of Christ

Contemporary churches, particularly of a conservative disposition, have as a prominent tenet of their faith the belief that Christ will come a "second time" at some point after his crucifixion/resurrection (around 30 CE).

This expression "second coming" appears, so far as I know, only one time in the New Testament:

[H]e has appeared once for all at the climax of history to abolish sin by the sacrifice of himself. Just as it is our human lot to die once, with judgment to follow, so Christ was offered once to bear the sins of mankind, and will appear a second time, not to deal with sin, but to bring salvation to those who eagerly await him. (Heb 9:26–28, Revised English Bible)1

Here is the same passage in another translation:

[H]e has appeared once for all at the end of the age to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. And just as it is appointed for men to die once, and after that comes the judgment, so Christ having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him. (RSV)

It is interesting to me that the second coming referred to in this passage in Hebrews does not sound as if it is part of the Day of God and the final judgment of the world as it appears in Rev 20:11–15; Matt 25:31–46; 2 Pet 3:10–13. The event in Hebrews (and 1 Thess 4:13–18) seems to be a different kind of event in which Christ returns "to save those eagerly waiting for him," as Hebrews puts it (RSV). This suggests that Christ followers will not face a final judgment at the end of time.

The usual expression in the New Testament for the return of the Lord is parousia. English words used to translate parousia are: "presence, coming, advent."2 Only eleven of the twenty-four uses of parousia, however, reference the coming of Jesus/Christ/Lord Jesus Christ/Lord Jesus.3 The other thirteen refer to: the coming of the Son of Man, Stephanas, Fortunatus, Achaicus, Titus, Paul's bodily presence, Paul, the Lawless One, Day of God.4

            There are several sayings of Jesus stating that he will come again.5 The earliest reference to a return of Jesus, however, is 1 Thess 4:13–18, where it is usually thought to be part of the Hebrew end-time Last Judgment scenario, the Day of God/Lord (see Isaiah 2 and 9, and Amos 2:1–3:21). Second Thessalonians is a disputed Pauline letter and its writer differs from Paul's own view in the undisputed First Thessalonians letter, where Paul held that "the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night" (1 Thess 5:2–3). In 2 Thess 2:1–12, on the other hand, the author writes that certain "signs" must happen before the parousia of the Lord Jesus Christ occurs. When those signs take place, people have fair warning that the parousia is near.

There is also to be considered a different idea about the (final?) Resurrection, a view held by Hymenaeus (who was excommunicated by the "Paul" of 1 Tim 1:19–20, a disputed Epistle attributed to Paul) and Philetus (2 Tim 2:18). Hymeneus believed that "the resurrection is past already." Apparently, these men denied the future resurrection of the physical body and held the resurrection to be a spiritual event in which one has died and risen with Christ, an event depicted in the experience of baptism (Rom 6:3–5). Compare the following statement in the later Gnostic essay, Treatise on Resurrection NHC I, 45.29–46.2:

Now if we are manifest in this world wearing him, we are that one's beams, and we are embraced by him until our setting, that is to say our death in this life. We are drawn to heaven by him, like beams by the sun, not being restrained by anything. This is the spiritual resurrection, which swallows up the psychic in the same way as the fleshly.6

The psychē is usually thought of as the soul, or if one prefers, from this contrast, the essential inner you, as opposed to the outer fleshly you. This writer claims that the "spiritual resurrection" incorporates them both. Hence, in the early second century there were two ways of viewing the resurrection of the dead: a completely spiritual experience and the physical events at the last judgment at the end of time. Paul, of course, agreed with Hymeneus (1 Cor 15:35–50).7 Paul anticipated a resurrection of believers that was at once bodily and spiritual. This appears to be what he describes in 1 Thess 4:13–18 and refers to in Rom 8:23.

            With respect to end time speculations, it might be wise to recall that toward the end of the first century there was a widespread belief that the Roman emperor Nero (who died 68 CE) would return to the throne of Rome again. It did not happen (or maybe it hasn't happened yet?). Believing a thing to be so, however, doesn't make it so.8

Charles W. Hedrick
Professor Emeritus
Missouri State University

1The date of Hebrews is uncertain. One recent dating (Attridge, The Epistle to the Hebrews [Hermeneia, 1989], 9]) dates the writing somewhere between 60–80. An earlier dating (Kϋmmel, Introduction to the New Testament [rev. ed.; SCM, 1975), 403] dates the writing between 80–90.

2W. Bauer and F. W. Danker, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. (3rd ed.; University of Chicago, 2000).

31 Cor 15:23; 1 Thess 2:19, 3:3, 4:15, 5:23; Jas 5:7, 8; 2 Pet 1:16, 3:4; 1 John 2:28; Matt 24:1.

4Matt 24:27, 37, 39; 1 Cor 16:17; 2 Cor 7:6, 7; 10:10; Phil 1:26, 2:12; 2 Thess 2:1, 8, 9; 2 Pet 3:12.

5For example, John 24:2–3, 18. I do not include the Son of Man sayings (Matt:24:27–30; Rev 16:15; 22:7, 12, 20) as the Son of Man may be a different figure.

6Malcolm Peel, Treatise on the Resurrection, vol. I, 123–57 in H. Attridge, ed. Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex) (NHS 22; 2 vols.; Brill, 1985).

71 Cor 15:51–55 is likely a reference to the "Second" coming (and not the Hebrew expectation of Judgment Day). at which time dead followers of Christ will "meet the Lord in the air" to forever be with him (1 Thess 4:13–18), the moment when the believer is changed in the "twinkling of an eye," receiving their "spiritual bodies" (Rom 8:23).

8http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nero_Redivivus

Wednesday, November 19, 2025

What Do Gods Do?

There is more than one God being worshipped around the world, so answering this question will depend on knowing which God one is referring-to and what is being said about that God, since all Gods do not behave alike. With those two caveats stated, this (it seems to me) is the rule: Gods do what they are thought to do—no more, no less! Basically, God is an idea that "exists" in most human minds. Hence, God has no "objectified existence"—that is, an "over-there-ness away from me" that can be pointed-to. God "is" (only in a sense) akin to an invisible immaterial spirit—and even that is too concrete. There is no spot in the entire universe where God can be located as a "material existing thing" as a person might be. Nor is God spread pervasively throughout the universe "in all things." To think in such a way is to objectify God by identifying God in some way with living creatures and plants (flora and fauna), and inanimate objects. A saying in the Gospel of Thomas attributed to Jesus, however, says precisely that: "Split a piece of wood; I am there. Take up a stone and you will find me there" (77b; cf. Colossians 1:17). All Gods (if Gods there be) do not inhabit a space time continuum in the universe as human beings do.

Primitive societies, however, did make one-to-one identifications between their idols (things representing God) and the spirit of mana thought to infuse their idols. The Greeks and Romans also objectified their Gods, representing them in statuary and even thinking that sometimes the God had taken human form. They even believed their statuary possessed some of the essential power of the God. For example, in the council chamber of the city of Stratonicea (West Coast of Asia Minor) there stood the statues of Zeus and Hecate, which were said in a formal city decree to "perform good deeds of great power." The citizenry celebrated their miracles daily by sacrifice, burning incense, praying, and giving thanks.

Christians, on the other hand, generally have not objectified God, with one noticeable exception. In the 5th century Nicene Creed Jesus, the Jewish sage, is elevated to "true God of true God" and worshipped and glorified. This is apparently a dual movement consisting of God becoming man and man becoming God: it may be thought of as an instance of divine spirit "infused" into flesh and blood, or the materializing of immaterial divine spirit into human matter. He was not always the Son of God (Rom 1:3).

An easier answered historical question, however, is what is God represented as doing in the Bible? That question can at least be investigated. The Bible is divided into two divisions: Hebrew Bible and New Testament. Among other things these divisions are characterized by two completely different thought worlds: Semitic (Hebrew Bible) and Hellenistic (New Testament). Hebrew Bible describes what God does from the perspective of Old Testament faiths according to Hebrew tradition, and the New Testament, drawing on the Old Testament, describes what earlier followers of Jesus believed about God's behavior from the perspective of New Testament faiths.

"Christian" ideas about what God does come much later as expressed in the early Christian creeds of the fourth and fifth centuries and later, which are not part of the biblical tradition, although Christians argue that both the Hebrew tradition and the early Jesus tradition inform Christian beliefs.

Between the two divisions of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament and the New Testament lies Jesus of Nazareth. The thought world (how he expressed himself) of Jesus is indebted to the Hebrew/Jewish traditions. Christian theology is partly based on the sayings of Jesus, the Jewish sage, and partly on Graeco-Roman ideas of divinity. The question becomes: according to Jesus, the Jewish sage, what does God do? The most critical sifting of all sayings attributed to Jesus in early Christian literature of the first and second centuries by the Jesus Seminar suggests that there is only modest God-language to be found in the residue of Jesus sayings that survived the lapses of memory of his earliest followers, and what was attributed to him in the piety of the later church. What little there is suggests that God is not sectarian but cares for good people and bad people alike (Matt 5:45b), even to the extent of providing for their daily needs, like feeding and clothing them (Matt 5:25–30; 7:11; 10:29–31). Jesus prayed for the daily provision of the basic necessities of life, as though he himself were indigent (Matt 5:11), and he thought that God's watch-care over the world extended to "numbering the hair on peoples' heads" and micromanaging the deaths of sparrows (Matt 10:29-31). He knows how to give good things to those who ask him (Matt 7:7–11). People of means, on the other hand, will have difficulty entering God's imperial rule (Mark 10:28; Matt 6:24).

When it comes to Gods, the biggest mistake most people make is thinking that their personal beliefs control what God does. As Job said, in a sudden flash of understanding, "Shall we receive good at the hand of God and not evil" (Job 2:10, cf. 30:26). In short, the ways of the Gods (if Gods there be) are inscrutable.1

Charles W. Hedrick
Professor Emeritus
Missouri State University

1This essay first appeared on this blog on June 13, 2013. It later appeared in print in Hedrick, Unmasking Biblical Faiths (2019). It appears here again reedited and expanded.