Friday, August 9, 2024

Aphorisms of Jesus

Here are three examples of an aphorism:

But many that are first will be last and the last first (Mark 10:31).

It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God (Mark 10:25).

Let the dead bury their own dead (Matt 8:22).1

An aphorism is spoken by Jesus before a group in the Roman Province of Judea and later is recalled (or not) by unnumbered minds. The saying is repeated (or not) by still fewer mouths and pens with both performance and interpretive variations. In an oral world generally “one speaks or writes an aphoristic saying, but one remembers an aphoristic core”2 on the basis of its sense and structure. One does not necessarily remember exact words. The core of the saying is subject to compression or expansion and changes when repeated. For example, compare the aphorism on First and Last: Mark 10:31, Matt 20:16, Luke 13:30, Gos. Thom. 4b.

            Aphorisms in the Jesus tradition at their literary stage appear in writing alone, as single sayings, and are gathered in pairs that lead to interpretative interaction and verbal and thematic seepage between them. They are also gathered into clusters (more than two) with similar results. They can also be appended as conclusions to other linguistic forms, such as miracles, prayers, parables, dialogues, and stories. The individual aphoristic saying is later gathered into aphoristic dialogues (for example, Matt 16:1-3; Luke 12:54-56; Gos. Thom. Saying 91) and aphoristic stories (for example, Mark 6:1-6a; Luke 4:16-30).

            There is a curious exclusion from the list of numbered aphorisms that Crossan finds in Q and Mark, and their parallels in Matthew and Luke. The aphoristic saying, “Let the dead bury their own dead, but as for you go and proclaim the kingdom of God” (Luke 9:60/Matt 8:22) is lacking an aphorism number, like other aphorisms discussed in the book. Its absence jumps-out at readers between numbered aphorisms 53 and 54 on pages 343 and 370 (In Fragments), and in his discussion of the aphoristic dialogues in Matt 8:19-22 and Luke 57-62.3 In these dialogues Matthew has two aphorisms (Foxes Have Holes and Let the Dead) and Luke has three (Foxes Have Holes, Let the Dead, and Looking Back). Crossan never notes why the saying Let the Dead (Luke 9:60/Matt 8:22) does not receive a number as an aphorism in the book. He regards Luke 9:59-60 as dialectical dialogue rather than aphoristic dialogue, and agrees with Rudolf Bultmann, whom it struck as “improbable” (nicht wahrscheinlich) that the saying ever circulated as a solitary saying.4 Nevertheless, both in form and content the individual saying in Luke 9:60/Matt 8:22 clearly fits the aphoristic criteria Crossan himself developed (see note 1). Granted, it is a Q tradition and only singularly attested, but that does not affect the aphoristic character of the saying Let the Dead, even if it is integrated into a dialectical dialogue.5

Crossan’s book, In Fragments. The Aphorisms of Jesus, is a landmark study of the transmission of the aphorisms of Jesus that establishes the aphorism, alongside the parable, as a classic oral form used by Jesus and later preserved at the earliest literary stage of the tradition.

Charles W. Hedrick
Professor Emeritus
Missouri State University

1Aphorisms are “concise, pointed, pithy sayings of never more than a few sentences.” “Thus, the aphoristic form conveys universal truths in a distinctive compressed format.” Both quotations are from the front cover. They are generally unclear on their surface, prompting an auditor to ponder because aphorisms frequently trade in overstatement and exaggeration, hyperbole, and paradox, and even understatement. J. D. Crossan, In Fragments. The Aphorisms of Jesus (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1983), 27.

2Crossan, In Fragments, 67.

3Crossan, In Fragments, 237-244.

4Crossan, In Fragments, 243; Rudolf Bultmann, Die Geschichte der Synoptischen Tradition (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1957), 29. Nevertheless, Crossan includes Matt 8:21-22/Luke 9:59-60 with the dialogues (#330) in his Sayings Parallels. A Workbook for the Jesus Tradition (Foundations and Facets; Philadelphia: Fortress, Press, 1986).

5The Jesus Seminar voted the aphorism in Matt 8:22 pink (a saying to be included in the data base for Jesus’ sayings) at Toronto in 1989, but voted Luke 9:60 gray (I would not include the saying in the database but might make some use of its contents) at Sonoma in 1988. Nevertheless, both sayings were printed pink in Robert W. Funk and Roy W. Hoover, The Five Gospels. The Search for the Authentic Words of Jesus (New York: Macmillan, 1993), 160, 316. Foundation and Facets Forum 6.3/4 (September/December 1990), 260, 276.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Charlie,

I recently reached the conclusion that Jesus' teaching on marriage and divorce is an aphorism rather than a command: "Therefore, what God has joined together let no one separate" (Mark 10:9; Matt 19:6b). It's hard to take literally when Jesus otherwise presents God as one who gives good gifts (Matt 7:9-11; Luke 11:11:11-13). It would be difficult to make the case that an abusive marriage
was a good gift. And there are other examples where Jesus used an imperative in an open-ended way. For example, "Love your enemies" (Luke 6:32, 35, 37; Matt 5:44) immediately raises the issue of 'Do I not protect my family from a home invader.' There are several contextual considerations as well, one of which is that Jesus reference to the Genesis passage is a quote
from the Septuagint which is the Greek translation of the Old Testament. Not many scholars think that Jesus was familiar with the Greek translation of the Old Testament used by the gospel writers. Another consideration is the fact that this marriage conversation with the Pharisees is the only such story in the gospels where Jesus is given the more conservative opinion. Further, Paul is very conservative about a married couple not separating, but he also strongly believed that the return of the Christ was imminent, and there must have been great pressure on the converts to remain in a marriage relationship.

This is a poor attempt to summarize a 3000 word essay, but I wanted to let others know that there has been an attempt to broaden the aphorism hypothesis in a critical area of human experience.

Gene Stecher
Chambersburg Pa.

Charles Hedrick said...

Good morning Gene! Thanks for weighing-in on aphorisms. The Marcan section (Mark 10:2-9) in which Mark 10:9 appears is not given an aphorism number in Dom Crossan's book: In Fragments. The Aphorisms of Jesus. That is because it is (in his view) a dialectical dialogue (pages 208-213). For what is at issue between dialectical dialogues and aphoristic dialogues see pages 237-44. He does, however, give Mark 10:11-12 an aphorism number (see pages 205-213). Cordially, Charlie

Anonymous said...

Hi Charlie,

I forgot to state clearly the major point I wanted to make. The Jesus Seminar vote for the marriage saying was gray or probably not original to the historical Jesus. I've interpreted my reasoning to mean that the marriage saying should be considered pink or original to the historical Jesus.

Gene Stecher
Chambersburg, Pa